Member Since Jun 7th, 2010
Are you Jennifer? If So, Login Here.
Apr 2nd 2013 9:25AM He has no class and was likely an arrogant jerk for 22 years. All he did was show himself for the ill bred bottom feeder he likely is. Nope - this doesn't work for me no matter who puts it on a house.
Feb 10th 2013 1:24PM @I wlive within my means
Banks have been modifying mortgage terms for decades. The only issue now is it's mostly public and an epidemic due to banking practices during the boom. The rest of your post is simply nonsense. When the banks foreclose on these houses, the investors lose money. It's a huge haircut to what they loaned. A modification eliminates that haircut on principle and just lowers the interest received. Every financial entity on the planet exposes themselves to risk when they lend - participating in stupidity is another matter. Chase services this loan but it advises the client and therein is another problem. When loans are modified to what people can really afford, the net result has been the loans become performing and the problem goes away. When banks do bandaid measures (not really reducing anything or doing anything significant) then it's a disaster. Did you know that every month Chase has to fool with this they get an additional payment from the true investor? This is a money maker for Chase. They do this to everyone due to the profit margin. Learn before you type.
Nov 14th 2012 9:09AM The real problem is airlines have not moved with the times. People have been getting taller for decades and still we have these tiny legroom openings. As for width? With height comes width. People are simply getting bigger. I walk into a plane and most everybody seems crammed in. I buy 2 seats just to be comfortable. Which is the point. Lose the third seat in each row, widen the 2 seats and just charge more for the ticket. I think they all would be surprised at how that would increase revenues. I flew on a Thai airline and the room they give for the ticket price is awesome. American airlines can do the same.
Aug 14th 2012 6:51AM Very cold looking house, austere in fact. The pool and the view are fabulous but the house has no warmth. I wouldn't pay a mill much less 38.
Jul 8th 2012 11:52AM It sounds discrimminatory on it's face. A kid's birthday party can have as many as 40 people in attendance. I bet they aren't required to apply for anything or do anything special in the event of a fire. How about a family cookout? A Nascar group? Or even one of those neighbors having a Longaberger, Pampered Chef, or Avon party?
It is what it is. Discrimmination. The neighbors are also complicit. I am not big into religion but when they come down on one person like that over something that's legal? They need to show me where they shut down kiddie birthday parties due to the numbers in attendance and then show me where they charge the owner with running a party business because they have more than one kid and have those parties regularly through the year.
Mar 29th 2012 4:52PM She got a copy of the docs before she settled on that condo. She knew up front items on the door frame weren't allowed. Another instance of someone figuring the rules won't apply to them when they complain or raise legal issues. You get a copy of the docs? Sign you understand them? Then you gave up the right to whatever you signed away. It's that simple. She could buy elsewhere. Oh, and it's possible to sign off your religious freedoms. You just sign! It's not a requirement that you have a religion, just freedom of it - unless you sign that away.
Feb 25th 2012 3:08PM I think BOA is swirling the drain. This too big to fall is nonsense. I think they will be the next to fall. They said Lehman Brothers was too big - surprise! Countrywide, etc. If they would fall - BOA, Citi - and the mortgage markets were back in the hands of smaller local banks - this would clear up PDQ.
Fannie is requiring them to buy back crap loans and BOA doesn't want to. They would rather sell them to lesser informed investors in packages and pools so they can get these crap loans off their books.
Swirl BOA swirl......
Feb 18th 2012 1:12PM Do you piss on your Wheaties in the morning, too?
Feb 18th 2012 1:10PM Finally some femininity that isn't over the top or grossly unaffordable.
Strapless has been around for ages. My mother wore one at her wedding and had a sheer cape over her shoulders. Amazing. She had a formal wedding, with all the trimmings, and has been married 52 years. Those that didn't have one and try to say it sets the bride and groom up for failure are likely the ones who are trying to make themselves feel better over what they missed.
The divorce rate isn't over church weddings. More people marry at the courthouse, back yards, Vegas, the islands, than do in churches. Perhaps if people treated it like a solemn, formal occassion and commitment then maybe the divorce rate would go down.
Bring on formal weddings. They are a breath of fresh air in a dress down world. Thank you Disney - these are gorgeous.
Jan 8th 2012 3:21PM That's you. And you get to live the way you choose. The people in this age restricted community are not being allowed to live the way they choose and for what they paid for.
Look, not everyone has had or even likes children. Many have had them and are now ready to live somewhere that they don't have to encounter child things daily. Age restricted communities are very minimal and they have the absolute right to not have permanent children living there.
Just because you aren't all about kids doesn't mean you shouldn't have freedom of choice of where and how you live.